#TheSpaceBar® is a blog by Alex and serves as a ride-along journey on his personal quest to learn more about Space-Related facts, laws, science, policies, and regulations. 


For more information, visit the Onboarding.

Disclaimer: This blog offers no legal advice, is not intended to be a source of legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you need legal advice, please seek out a lawyer directly. I am just a space cadet in this adventure, and after all, space law/policy can be like rocket science.

Mining for the Future

Mining for the Future

NASA Asteroid Redirect Robotic ARM Mission capturing an asteroid boulder (courtesy of  NASA )

NASA Asteroid Redirect Robotic ARM Mission capturing an asteroid boulder (courtesy of NASA)

Mining is like a search and destroy mission
— Stewart Udall

With all this talk of cryptomining this year (bitcoin and ethereum have both soared to record-highs), I figure it is high time to discuss the future of outer space mining as well. Once considered more science fiction than reality, the asteroid mining field have started to take its first steps out of infancy. With several privately-funded companies, such as Deep Space Industries and Planetary Resources, already firmly established in the field, asteroid mining will undoubtedly become a crowded sector in the near future. In fact, Deep Space Industries is already planning to launch its precursor mission, Prospector-X, to low Earth orbit later on this year, laying the groundwork (or should I say spacework) for its inaugural space mining mission before the end of this decade.

In many ways, the emergence of asteroid mining as a field is of a necessity for the success of future space exploration missions. First, resources on earth is not unlimited; while an active debate rages on when key elements involved in space-related technology, such as palladium, platinum, and etc. might dry up, earth’s availability of these elements is not going up. Second, escaping earth’s gravity itself takes a lot of energy and resources (i.e. it takes about $10,000 to launch a can of Coke into space). If we can manage to make asteroid mining both a cost-efficient and safe reality, the field could laid the foundation for the development of outer-space refineries and manufacturing plants; with these facilities, humanity would be able to mine and refine the materials for, and construct spacecrafts outside of Earth’s gravity, enabling us to plan space explorations of far longer duration at a fraction of the cost of launching that same mission from earth.

But, before asteroid mining can truly jet off of its infancy, the legal framework surrounding this field will need further refinement. The current legal state of asteroid mining leaves too much uncertainty for the field to fully flourish, below is what I have uncovered.

The Past: the Outer Space Treaty, the Moon Treaty, and the Apollo “Moon Mining” Missions

Outer Space Treaty is of no Help

As with many laws dealing with outer space, the starting point for the legality of asteroid mining is also the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. In Article II, the Outer Space Treaty states that “outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.” Since an asteroid is a type of “celestial body,” then through a strict textual reading of the Outer Space Treaty, no country or company could lay any ownership claim to any asteroid. And without the mining rights that come with ownership, then technically speaking, no company or country would be able to asteroid-mine since these entities do not have the ownership rights to the elements extracted .

But, the story does not end there. As any lawyer in the technology transactions sector (a field that yours truly is a novice practitioner of) can tell you, sometimes you can even have rights to an object that you do not own: a company could obtain such quasi-ownership rights through licensing provisions; and the legal foundation for the provisioning of asteroid mining licenses can also be found within the Outer Space Treaty. In the very first article of the Outer Space Treaty, it notes that “the exploration and use of . . . celestial bodies . . . shall be the province of all mankind. Outer space, including . . . celestial bodies . . . shall be free for . . . use by all States without discrimination of any kind . . . and there shall be free access to all areas of celestial bodies.”

By using the word “use,” some, including asteroid mining companies, have argued that while the Outer Space Treaty does not allow any entity to own an asteroid, it specifically enables asteroid mining as a type of use “licensing” right that would be available to any entity. This would necessarily mean that any entity, while not owning the celestial body itself, would be able to control and own the minerals/elements that such entity extracts from such celestial body. The earth-based analogy would be fishing in international waters: while no country owns any part of such ocean, all countries would have quasi-ownership rights in such waters, including the ability to fish, navigate, lay cables, and perform research activities.

The Moon Precedent

Since the Outer Space Treaty can be used to support arguments on both sides, we must dig a little farther to see how these laws have been operating in real life. Luckily, we got one instance of a type of “space mining” that had been done before: the Apollo missions to the moon. Before we get into the details of “moon mining,” I would be remiss if I did not mention the Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, or the Moon Treaty, of 1979. The Moon Treaty governs all activities related to the moon and other celestial bodies within the solar system. The provisions of interest for asteroid mining here are very similar to that of the Outer Space Treaty. In Article 11 of the Moon Treaty, it declares that “the moon is not subject to national appropriation by any claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.” The Moon Treaty also notes that no national activities will create any “right of ownership over the surface or the subsurface of the moon or any areas thereof.” But, similar to the Outer Space Treaty, in Article 1, the Moon Treaty also allows for “use and exploration” of the moon as long as it is “carried out in accordance with international law.”

Hence, we have a situation that is very similar to the Outer Space Treaty: while nobody can claim any ownership rights to the moon, every nation does have use rights to the moon. So, while the Moon Treaty appears to be just as ambiguous as the Outer Space Treaty in dealing with the topic of asteroid mining, the Apollo moon missions create real life legal precedent in how this language could be interpreted.

According to NASA’s Lunar Sample Allocation Guidebook, the Apollo missions “returned to Earth a total of 382 kilograms (842 pounds) of geologic samples.” While not done for commercial reasons, these geologic samples could be considered a primitive form of mining. And even if the United States, via NASA, does not have ownership rights to the Moon, it certainly appears that the United States have total ownership rights and control to these samples. For instance, the same Allocation Guidebook states that “NASA policies define lunar samples as a limited national resource and future heritage, and require that samples be released only for approved applications in research, education, and public display.” Additionally, NASA had already exchanged some of these samples with the then-USSR Academy of Sciences. With these open and notorious as well as perverse “use” activities, it is hard to argue that the United States does not have ownership rights to these samples. Therefore, based on these moon samples, one could argue that asteroid mining would be perfectly legal since an entity is only asserting control/ownership of the resources it mines.

However, while the Apollo Moon missions serve as a useful precedent for asteroid mining, it also does not tell the full story. First, the United States, along with many other space-faring nations, is not a signatory to the Moon Treaty, so it is unclear whether the Moon Treaty has any practical effect. Second, the Apollo missions only “mined” a very small and insignificant portion of the moon. Today’s asteroid mining companies are not looking to stop at mere samples; they are looking to extract as much resources as possible. Hence, it is still an open legal issue to determine at what point does the amount of resources extracted would cause that space-miner to be deemed the "owner" of the asteroid, thereby violating the Outer Space Treaty.

The Present: National Treasure for the United States and Luxembourg

While the international laws surrounding asteroid mining remains murky, some countries have pressed ahead and established new legal policies and regulations that have been viewed positively by the asteroid mining community. The two countries at this frontier are the United States and Luxembourg.

In 2015, President Obama signed the Spurring Private Aerospace Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship, or SPACE, Act into law. Under the SPACE Act, “A United States citizen engaged in commercial recovery of an asteroid resource or a space resource . . . shall be entitled to [such resource] obtained, including to possess, own, transport, use, and sell [such resource] obtained.” With these words, the SPACE Act has essentially made asteroid mining legal for U.S. citizens, with the caveat that these mining activities must be conducted “in accordance with applicable law, including the international obligations of the United States.” While the SPACE Act further declares that “the United States does not thereby assert sovereignty or sovereign or exclusive rights or jurisdiction over, or the ownership of, any celestial body,” some critics have argued that it is still in violation of the Outer Space Treaty since such mining rights are not conducted “for the benefit and in the interest of all countries.”

Not to be outdone, in 2017, Luxembourg’s Parliament also adopted a legal framework surrounding the exploration and use of space resources. While never having sent a human or a spacecraft into outer space, Luxembourg is fully embracing outer space mining in its quest to become the world’s capital of asteroid mining. Effective as of August 1, 2017, this law powerfully pronounces in its very first article that “Space resources are capable of being appropriated.” The law then lays out in detail the procedures that are needed to receive an asteroid mining license from the Luxembourg government. Unlike the SPACE Act, asteroid mining was not an after-thought in the text of the Act and this law is applicable to both citizens and non-citizens of Luxembourg. By becoming the first nation to establish such a comprehensive regime related to space mining, Luxembourg is hoping that it will not only jolt the industry forward but also become the preferred state of incorporation for many asteroid mining companies in the future.

The Future: Space is Unlimited

Speaking of the future, once considered a realm of science fiction, asteroid mining is slowly becoming a bona fide reality. Following the lead of United States and Luxembourg, more and more countries are likely to pass their own outer space mining laws to ensure that they do not fall behind in this lucrative market (resources on some asteroids are calculated to be worth up to 100 trillion dollars). As the field matures, the foundational international treaties surrounding asteroid mining will undoubtedly need to be updated. But, each nation should take heart in knowing that outer space is much bigger than any ocean on earth, and there are plenty of element-rich asteroids for every nation to explore and mine.

Resources

Are Space Tourists Astronauts?

Are Space Tourists Astronauts?

Launch Clearance

Launch Clearance